- Name:
- Student Number:
- Award:
- e-Mail (home, work, university):
- Project Title:
- Aim:
- Deliverables:
- Research question(s):
- Literature Review:
- Comparison with other works that was done before:
- Research Method:
- Evaluation:
- Ethical Issues:
Will the project require interviewing anybody other than members of college | No |
Will the project be using a questionnaire to gather data or evaluate the software/system? | No |
Will the project involve human test subjects? |
Yes |
Will the project involve access to personal information on individuals? | No |
Will the project be a hazard for any government sectors? | No |
Involving Human Test Subjects:
(For example: Email:, Phone No:)
Hardware and Software Requirements:
References:—————————————————————–
APPENDICES:————————————————————–
Risk Assessment:————————————————————-
Provisional Schedule:
Client:
————————————————————————————————————–
Feedback Form:
Student Number: Student Name:
Work Seen | Date Seen | Comments (by module team) | Action taken (by student) |
Week 1 feedback
|
|||
Week 2 feedback
|
Literature review extremely weak. Need to be addressed asap. See prov supervisor to identify deliverables and research questions for such a project |
Developed Aim, Deliverables, research questions, literarture review. |
|
Week 3 feedback
|
1.Aim not clear2.Deliverables requires more thoughts, lacks focus3. Research question not well structured-not good for the dev of chess board games.
4. No literature review produced, you need to show previous work people/researchers who works on this subject/topic. |
1.changed the aim and made it short and clear2. A focused deliverables have been given and changed3. Organised research questions.
4. Once again produced a new literature review which explains other researchers work. 5. Produced ethical issues |
|
Week 3feedback
|
See Feedback On Proposal sheet(those are
|
1.Changed the title name in a organised way2.Change the research question3.literature review re-organised removing the I, We and some other
4. research method, evaluation, ethics, and ethical form has been added
|
|
Week 4 feedback | Check on Proposal Document(those are1. Re-organise the deliverables
2. Check the grammar in the literature review 3. Link the research method properly 4. Changes to the ethical form |
1.Organised the deliverables2.Grammar in the literature review sorted3.linked and organised the research method
Applied changes to the ethical form. |
SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-
ETHICAL APPROVAL FORM
ALL APPLICANTS (Staff or Student)
Name of applicant:
Name of supervisor:
Title of project:
Supervisor signature:
STUDENTS ONLY
Student no:
Course: MSc Information Technology
Module code:
Applicant signature:
PROJECT SPECIFICS:
Aims and objectives of the study:
Proposed target group(s):
Number of interviews to be undertaken or number of questionnaires to be distributed:5
Is a sample survey planned? Yes
State the method of randomisation:
Means of distribution:
Please outline the method of analysis:
Which software packages will be used?
Date of submission to school office:
PART 2: TO BE COMPLETED BY ETHICS COMMITTEE
Category of project (B, A or 0):
Comments and actions required:
Signed:
School Ethics Committee
Date: