• Name:
  • Student Number:
  • Award:
  • e-Mail (home, work, university):
  • Project Title:
  • Aim:
  • Deliverables:
  • Research question(s):
  • Literature Review:
  • Comparison with other works that was done before:
  • Research Method:
  • Evaluation:
  • Ethical Issues:
Will the project require interviewing anybody other than members of college   No
Will the project be using a questionnaire to gather data or evaluate the software/system?   No

Will the project involve human test subjects?

 Yes
Will the project involve access to personal information on individuals?   No
Will the project be a hazard for any government sectors?   No

Involving Human Test Subjects:

 (For example: Email:, Phone No:)

Hardware and Software Requirements:

References:—————————————————————–

APPENDICES:————————————————————–

Risk Assessment:————————————————————-

Provisional Schedule:

 ms dissertation proposal

Client:

————————————————————————————————————–

Feedback Form:

Student Number:                  Student Name:

Work Seen Date Seen Comments (by module team) Action taken (by student)
Week 1 feedback  

 

     
Week 2 feedback  

 

 

Literature review extremely weak. Need to be addressed asap. See prov supervisor to identify deliverables and research questions  for such a project

Developed Aim, Deliverables, research questions, literarture review.

Week 3 feedback  

 

 

1.Aim not clear2.Deliverables requires more thoughts, lacks focus3. Research question not well structured-not good for the dev of chess board games.

4. No literature review produced, you need to show previous work people/researchers who works on this subject/topic.

1.changed the aim and made it short and clear2. A focused deliverables have been given and changed3. Organised research questions.

4. Once again produced a new literature review which explains other researchers work.

5. Produced ethical issues

Week          3feedback 

 

 

 

See Feedback On Proposal sheet(those are

  1. Reorganise the Title Name
  2. Change the deliverables as it represent like a specs
  3. Re-write the research questions
  4. Do not use I, We in the literature review.
  5. No research method and evaluation
1.Changed the title name in a organised way2.Change the research question3.literature review re-organised removing the I, We and some other

4. research method, evaluation, ethics, and ethical form has been added

 

Week          4 feedback Check on Proposal Document(those are1. Re-organise the deliverables

2. Check the grammar in the literature review

3. Link the research method properly

4. Changes to the ethical form

1.Organised the deliverables2.Grammar in the literature review sorted3.linked and organised the research method

Applied changes to the ethical form.

 

 SCHOOL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY- 

ETHICAL APPROVAL FORM 

ALL APPLICANTS (Staff or Student) 

Name of applicant

Name of supervisor: 

Title of project:

Supervisor signature:

STUDENTS ONLY

Student no:

Course: MSc Information Technology

Module code:

Applicant signature: 

PROJECT SPECIFICS: 

Aims and objectives of the study: 

Proposed target group(s): 

Number of interviews to be undertaken or number of questionnaires to be distributed:5 

Is a sample survey planned? Yes 

State the method of randomisation: 

Means of distribution: 

Please outline the method of analysis: 

Which software packages will be used? 

Date of submission to school office:

PART 2: TO BE COMPLETED BY ETHICS COMMITTEE

Category of project (B, A or 0): 

Comments and actions required: 

Signed:     

School Ethics Committee

Date: